Charactertest and negativ witness
The arrangement of a character tests by the Authority or the need within the approval procedure provides dog owners with the question of what effect a non may have passed the character test.
It has to be cleaned up with the misconception that one in every province passed the character test could reverse or refute the finding of dangerousness.
Decisive are the state dog laws or regulations and how each of the is determined dangerousness of the dog and possibly refuted.
See also, the mutual recognitions of character tests in the State laws or regulations.
The danger of a dog is in most states established by the belonging to a specific breed of dog or by a dog's behavior ( eg biting people or other dogs , so called " danger threatening Pounce "
uncontrolled tearing of game, etc. ).
After such behavior shall make the dangerous nature of the dog in the Rule by a decision firmly .
The membership of the dog to a "race list " is the danger by the Law or regulation suspected.